Passive port monitoring


The optional feature of Passive Port Monitoring (PPM), as defined in Annex G of ITU-T G.8275.1, has proven to be a valuable asset in the operation of synchronization networks.
PPM can be used to monitor the Precision Time Protocol (PTP) phase/time difference between the passive port and the slave port of T-T-BC /T-TSC nodes and can furthermore be used for the following use cases:

  • Measuring and compensating for asymmetry in network nodes
  • Monitoring and comparing the PTP phase/time difference between different clock sources throughout the network
  • Continuously measuring the PTP phase/time difference between ports on a given T-BC /T-TSC node from upstream time sources to help identify devices that might impact the clock quality.
    In this test, we verified two scenarios involving PPM, where an Impairment Device introduced asymmetry, enabling us to observe an offset with PPM.
        
    In the first scenario, Telecom Boundary Clock-1 (T-BC-1) was directly connected and locked to the Telecom Grandmaster (T-GM). Telecom Boundary Clock-2 was also locked to the Telecom Grandmaster; however, with an impairment device, the Calnex SNE Ignite, in between. If the Keysight Time Sync Analyzer was used as an emulated T-GM, then the output of the emulated T-GM was impaired directly without an external impairment device.
    540 nanoseconds (ns) of delay asymmetry was introduced initially, then changed to -300ns for the second stage.
    T-BC-1  and T-BC-2  were also physically connected, with the port on T-BC-2 acting as a master to T-BC-1  and the port on T-BC-1  configured for PPM.
    This test was conducted with five different combinations, all of which passed. All T-BC-1s were able to measure the +270ns and -150ns offsets due to the delay asymmetry.
Figure 117

Figure 117: Passive Port Monitoring - Setup

For the second scenario, T-BC-1  was directly locked to the GNSS and used it as its primary reference instead of the T-GM. T-BC-2  was still locked to the T-GM with an impairment device, the Calnex SNE Ignite, in between, once again introducing 540ns/-300ns of delay asymmetry. If the T-GM was emulated by the Keysight Time Sync Analyzer, then once again no external impairment device was used, as the impairment was introduced by the emulated T-GM.
The connection and relation between T-BC-1  and T-BC-2  did not change when compared to the first scenario; T-BC-2  still had a master port towards T-BC-1 's PPM port.
This test was conducted in three different combinations, which all once again passed, as all T-BC -1s were still able to measure the +270ns and -150ns offset due to the delay asymmetry.

Figure 118

Figure 118: Passive Port Monitoring based on GNSS input - Setup

GM-AT-BC-1T-BC-2Impairment deviceTiming Test Equipment
Keysight Time Sync AnalyzerH3C S12500R-48Y8CEricsson Router6671Keysight Time Sync Analyzer
Keysight Time Sync AnalyzerJuniper ACX7100-32CArrcus S9600-72XCKeysight Time Sync Analyzer
Keysight Time Sync AnalyzerEricsson Router6671H3C S12500R-48Y8CKeysight Time Sync Analyzer
Microchip TimeProvider® 4500Huawei ATN 910D-ACiena 5134Calnex SNE IgniteCalnex Paragon-neo PAM4
Microchip TimeProvider® 4500Microchip TimeProvider® 4500Huawei ATN 910D-ACalnex SNE IgniteCalnex Paragon-neo PAM4

Table 68: Passive port monitoring - Passive port monitoring option as per ITU-T G.8275.1 Annex G

GM-AT-BC-1T-BC-2Impairment deviceTiming Test Equipment
Keysight Time Sync AnalyzerCiena 5134Arrcus S9600-72XCKeysight Time Sync Analyzer
Keysight Time Sync AnalyzerEricsson Router6671H3C S12500R-48Y8CKeysight Time Sync Analyzer
Microchip TimeProvider® 4500Ciena 5134Huawei ATN 910D-ACalnex SNE IgniteCalnex Paragon-neo PAM4

Table 69: Passive port monitoring - Passive port monitoring with an GNSS input option as per ITU-T G.8275.1 Annex G