|
|
1 |
(% class="row" %) |
|
|
2 |
((( |
|
|
3 |
(% class="col-xs-12 col-sm-7 test-report-content" %) |
|
|
4 |
((( |
|
|
5 |
---- |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
The optional feature of Passive Port Monitoring (PPM), as defined in Annex G of ITU-T G.8275.1, has proven to be a valuable asset in the operation of synchronization networks. |
|
|
8 |
PPM can be used to monitor the Precision Time Protocol (PTP) phase/time difference between the passive port and the slave port of T-T-BC /T-TSC nodes and can furthermore be used for the following use cases: |
|
|
9 |
*. Measuring and compensating for asymmetry in network nodes |
|
|
10 |
*. Monitoring and comparing the PTP phase/time difference between different clock sources throughout the network |
|
|
11 |
*. Continuously measuring the PTP phase/time difference between ports on a given T-BC /T-TSC node from upstream time sources to help identify devices that might impact the clock quality. |
|
|
12 |
In this test, we verified two scenarios involving PPM, where an Impairment Device introduced asymmetry, enabling us to observe an offset with PPM. |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
In the first scenario, Telecom Boundary Clock-1 (T-BC-1) was directly connected and locked to the Telecom Grandmaster (T-GM). Telecom Boundary Clock-2 was also locked to the Telecom Grandmaster; however, with an impairment device, the Calnex SNE Ignite, in between. If the Keysight Time Sync Analyzer was used as an emulated T-GM, then the output of the emulated T-GM was impaired directly without an external impairment device. |
|
|
15 |
540 nanoseconds (ns) of delay asymmetry was introduced initially, then changed to -300ns for the second stage. |
|
|
16 |
T-BC-1 and T-BC-2 were also physically connected, with the port on T-BC-2 acting as a master to T-BC-1 and the port on T-BC-1 configured for PPM. |
|
|
17 |
This test was conducted with five different combinations, all of which passed. All T-BC-1s were able to measure the +270ns and -150ns offsets due to the delay asymmetry. |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
[[Figure 117: Passive Port Monitoring - Setup>>image:434080470783754241_5.11.png||alt="Figure 117" width="550"]] |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
For the second scenario, T-BC-1 was directly locked to the GNSS and used it as its primary reference instead of the T-GM. T-BC-2 was still locked to the T-GM with an impairment device, the Calnex SNE Ignite, in between, once again introducing 540ns/-300ns of delay asymmetry. If the T-GM was emulated by the Keysight Time Sync Analyzer, then once again no external impairment device was used, as the impairment was introduced by the emulated T-GM. |
|
|
22 |
The connection and relation between T-BC-1 and T-BC-2 did not change when compared to the first scenario; T-BC-2 still had a master port towards T-BC-1 's PPM port. |
|
|
23 |
This test was conducted in three different combinations, which all once again passed, as all T-BC -1s were still able to measure the +270ns and -150ns offset due to the delay asymmetry. |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
[[Figure 118: Passive Port Monitoring based on GNSS input - Setup>>image:434080470783819777_5.12.png||alt="Figure 118" width="550"]] |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
27 |
{{container cssClass="tc-role-table"}} |
|
|
28 |
(% class="table-bordered" %) |
|
|
29 |
|=GM-A|=T-BC-1|=T-BC-2|=Impairment device|=Timing Test Equipment |
|
|
30 |
|Keysight Time Sync Analyzer|H3C S12500R-48Y8C|Ericsson Router6671||Keysight Time Sync Analyzer |
|
|
31 |
|Keysight Time Sync Analyzer|Juniper ACX7100-32C|Arrcus S9600-72XC||Keysight Time Sync Analyzer |
|
|
32 |
|Keysight Time Sync Analyzer|Ericsson Router6671|H3C S12500R-48Y8C||Keysight Time Sync Analyzer |
|
|
33 |
|Microchip TimeProvider® 4500|Huawei ATN 910D-A|Ciena 5134|Calnex SNE Ignite|Calnex Paragon-neo PAM4 |
|
|
34 |
|Microchip TimeProvider® 4500|Microchip TimeProvider® 4500|Huawei ATN 910D-A|Calnex SNE Ignite|Calnex Paragon-neo PAM4 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
36 |
Table 68: Passive port monitoring - Passive port monitoring option as per ITU-T G.8275.1 Annex G |
|
|
37 |
{{/container}} |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
39 |
{{container cssClass="tc-role-table"}} |
|
|
40 |
(% class="table-bordered" %) |
|
|
41 |
|=GM-A|=T-BC-1|=T-BC-2|=Impairment device|=Timing Test Equipment |
|
|
42 |
|Keysight Time Sync Analyzer|Ciena 5134|Arrcus S9600-72XC||Keysight Time Sync Analyzer |
|
|
43 |
|Keysight Time Sync Analyzer|Ericsson Router6671|H3C S12500R-48Y8C||Keysight Time Sync Analyzer |
|
|
44 |
|Microchip TimeProvider® 4500|Ciena 5134|Huawei ATN 910D-A|Calnex SNE Ignite|Calnex Paragon-neo PAM4 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
46 |
Table 69: Passive port monitoring - Passive port monitoring with an GNSS input option as per ITU-T G.8275.1 Annex G |
|
|
47 |
{{/container}} |
|
|
48 |
(% id="prev-next-links" %) |
|
|
49 |
|[[< Previous>>doc:T-BC Interworking Protocol and Performance]]|[[Next ~>>>doc:O-RAN Tests]] |
|
|
50 |
))) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
52 |
(% class="col-xs-12 col-sm-5 test-report-sidebar" %) |
|
|
53 |
((( |
|
|
54 |
{{box}} |
|
|
55 |
{{include reference="Main.Multi-Vendor MPLS & SDN Interoperability Test Report 2025.Sidebar Nav"/}} |
|
|
56 |
{{/box}} |
|
|
57 |
))) |
|
|
58 |
))) |