Show last authors
1 (% class="row" %)
2 (((
3 (% class="col-xs-12 col-sm-7 test-report-content" %)
4 (((
5 ----
6
7 Controlling and handling asymmetric delay on links that carry PTP messages is of the utmost importance and is one of the big challenges for network time synchronization.
8 This test was performed in four different combinations. The setup consisted of one Grandmaster (either real or emulated), whose link towards Boundary Clock-1 is impaired; if an emulated T-GM was used, like the Calnex Paragon-Neo PAM4 and Keysight Time Sync Analyzer, then the impairment was provided directly by the emulated T-GM; if a real T-GM, the Microchip TimeProvider® 4500 was used, then an external impairment device, the Calnex SNE Ignite, was used.
9 T-BC-1 is initially directly connected to a GNSS reference and Boundary Clock-2 (T-BC-2), which is connected to a time error measurement device (Calnex Paragon-Neo PAM4 or Keysight Time Sync Analyzer).
10 In three of the four combinations, PTP profile ITU-T G.8275.2 was used throughout the entire chain; in the fourth combination, the interworking function (IWF) from PTP profile ITU-T G.8275.2 to ITU-T G.8275.1 was used between T-BC-1 (Ciena 5134) and T-BC-2 (Juniper PTX10002-36QDD) and the connection between T-BC-2 and the time error measurement device was done over an 800G link.
11
12 [[Figure 128: Delay Asymmetry Detection/Measurement - Setup>>image:434430579187449857_5.20.png||alt="Figure 128" width="550"]]
13
14 At first, the GM and T-BC-1 were connected to the GNSS, and T-BC-2 used T-BC-1 as its primary time source. The GNSS was then disconnected from T-BC-1; T-BC-1 then locked onto the GM as its new time source, with the link between the GM and T-BC-1 being impaired by introducing an asymmetric delay of 500ns. During this process, the time error was measured on T-BC-2, and none of the measurements reflected the 500ns asymmetry, proving that all T-BC-1s could detect and eliminate the asymmetry.
15 The network passed the class accuracy level of 6 for all test runs, as per ITU-T G.8271, throughout the entire test run, including the switchover; the first three test runs, which used PTP profile ITU-T G.8275.2 throughout the entire chain all passed class accuracy level 6C. The IWF test run passed the class accuracy level of 6A.
16
17 These results are remarkable and a big victory for Time Synchronization. They prove that asymmetric delays can very well be handled, beating one of the big challenges of Time Synchronization.
18
19 {{container cssClass="tc-role-table"}}
20 (% class="table-bordered" %)
21 |=GM-A|=T-BC-1|=T-BC-2|=Impairment device|=Timing Test Equipment
22 |Calnex Paragon-neo PAM4|Microchip TimeProvider® 4500|Huawei ATN 910D-A||Calnex Paragon-neo PAM4
23 |Keysight Time Sync Analyzer|Ciena 5134|H3C S12500R-48Y8C||Keysight Time Sync Analyzer
24 |Microchip TimeProvider® 4500|Ciena 5134|Arrcus S9600-72XC|Calnex SNE Ignite|Calnex Paragon-neo PAM4
25
26 Table 72: Delay Asymmetry Detection/Measurement with APTS - PTP Profile ITU-T G.8275.2
27 {{/container}}
28
29 {{container cssClass="tc-role-table"}}
30 (% class="table-bordered" %)
31 |=GM-A|=T-BC-1|=T-BC-2|=Impairment device|=Timing Test Equipment
32 |Microchip TimeProvider® 4500|Ciena 5134|Juniper PTX10002-36QDD|Calnex SNE Ignite|Calnex Paragon-neo S
33
34 Table 73: Delay Asymmetry Detection/Measurement with APTS - PTP Profile ITU-T G.8275.2 to ITU-T G.8275.1 - 800G
35 {{/container}}
36 (% id="prev-next-links" %)
37 |[[< Previous>>doc:Calculating Time Error Limits for Boundary Clocks]]|[[Next ~>>>doc:Simulated Grandmaster GNSS disruption - Bridging Mode]]
38 )))
39
40 (% class="col-xs-12 col-sm-5 test-report-sidebar" %)
41 (((
42 {{box}}
43 {{include reference="Main.Multi-Vendor MPLS & SDN Interoperability Test Report 2025.Sidebar Nav"/}}
44 {{/box}}
45 )))
46 )))